chunk 78: lectures
overview of flat and bent
rules that should be studied first
choose-
change-
choose-
change-
How to learn the wordfinal
Samskrita Bharati style
Brute force style
Traditional style
Inria gadget style
Different kinds of nothing.
^

The affixes that replace tenses can mean the doer or not.
When they do not mean the doer, they are always bent, by bhAva;karmaNoH.
When they mean the doer, it depends on the root --
There are flatty roots like
and bendy roots like
and flattybendy roots like
and there are a lot of grammar rules that explain which roots are flatty, which are bendy, and which are flattybendy.
Or, at least, that is what the grammar rules say. Please be warned that lots of authors in the last three thousand years either never heard of those rules, or unapologetically ignored them. So, don't panic when you find a
Here the
(rulesthatshouldbestudi) (rulesthfi)
^

People that use books to learn languages are used to the books being divided into lessons, with the basic things in the first lesson and the second lesson written for people that learned the first.
The
So my advice is: do what your teacher says. But if you don't have any, where to start? my advice is --
First learn some of the sandhi rules, that is, the ones that are used most often, like hazica and atoro and akassa and atoguNe.
Then learn some of the rules about using the sup affixes and feminine affixes.
And then some of the rules that make verbs, starting at kartarizap. The first rules to be studied are those mentioned in the "building" pages listed under examples of using inria to disassemble verbs , such as kartarizap lasya tiGas tAnyeka jhontaH.
^

Rule lasya says that every tense affix, after we add it after a root, must be replaced with one of the eighteen tiG affixes. How do we know which affix to choose? There are many rules teaching which one.
The most important rule is laHkarmaNi. This says, among other things, that we may choose an affix that has the same number and person as the doer of the root. For instance, if we want to say that the hens cross, or crossed, or will cross the road, then the doer of the root
(We know that we must use a plural affix because rule bahuSubahu teaches so, and we need a third person affix because rule zeSeprathamaH says so.)
Now, rule tiGastrINi teaches that six of the tiG affixes are third person, namely tiptasjhi and tAtAJjha.
Then, rule tAnyeka tells us that the third affix of each group of three is plural. So only the affixes jhi and jha are third person and plural.
Of those two, jhi is flat and jha is bent. We will use jhi unless some rule says that we must or may use the bent.
So the verb we need will be made by replacing any tense with jhi. For instance, to mean present time, we add laT to the root, then replace laT with jhi --
To express past time, we may use laG or other tenses. when we add laG and replace it with jhi we get --
(howtolearnthewordfinal) (howlearr)
^

Some warnings about the right way of learning the sandhi rules.
The wordfinal sandhi rules are the sound-changing rules that affect the last letters of a word.
As a consequence of those rules, the word
and sounds like
like
and like
These changes must happen in the spoken language and in the written language at all times. And that's a big burden for freshmen, because they will make two kinds of mistakes while not knowing yet the rule "
(A) when they assemble in their head a sentence from two words, they will say incorrectly
(B) when reading the correct
If you don't have a reasonably familiarity with the rules, not only you'll speak wrong, but also, when reading, you will have trouble figuring out where a word ends and the next begins.
There are about two hundred sandhi rules in the grammar. As far as I know there are four ways to teach them.
(samskritabharatistyle) (sams)
^

The easiest way to teach sound changes is not teaching them at all. You first make your students understand that
The advantage of this approach is that the students will be very happy and will talk with great self-confidence and self-esteem, and will never be confused by those pesky sound-change rules.
The disadvantage is that, not knowing anything about the rules, they will be very confused when they try to read actual Sanskrit text, and they will do one mistake after another when they try to write. They will converse happily but will be illiterate. If they decide to continue studying Sanskrit, next year they will have to learn that
^

For the brute force style, the teacher makes a list of all sound-change rules, such as this one, and tells the student to memorize all of them. After that, the student must do a lot of exercises applying the rules, such as "
The problem with this aspproach is that doing all the rules takes a year, and at the end of this year, the student becomes so bored of sound change rules as to decide that Sanskrit is too complicated and that no one is smart enough to remember the rules while talking.
^

The traditional way to teach sound change is this --
1. The teacher recites a verse, such as for instance --
2. The makes the students repeat the verse.
3. Then explains the meaning of each word. For instance he says --
4. If needed, he explains the sound changes that appeared in the verse --
5. The teacher might explain which
After twenty verses the students will have seen several examples of the rule that changes
^

The problem with the Traditional style is that you need a teacher to make it work.
If you don't have a teacher at hand to teach you to split a verse into words,
then you use the inria reader to learn that "
and when you need to join
After getting used to these tools you will start to not need them, because you will hear
So you won't need to learn the rules after all. The important part is learning to recognize that
At this point you might ask, if I can manage to join words and split sentences without studying the rules, what is the point of having rules at all?
Simple. Rules were not made to teach you. Rules were made to make teachers, and the people that make gadgets like inria, agree on the correct way of joining and splitting.
(differentkindsofnothin) (differeth)
^

The
There are different kinds of nothing --
(1) Replacing something with lopa deletes one letter. When rule saMyogAnta commands "replace
(2) luk is a more destructive sort of nothing. When SaDbhyoluk teaches "replace zas with luk", that turns the whole zas into nothingness. So
Not only that. If adding an affix made changes to its stem, replacing that affix with luk will roll back those changes.
(3) replacing an affix with lup has the same effects that luk has, and it also rolls back the changes that the original affix made to the gender and number of its stem.
(4) zlu is a sort of nothing that, when added after a root, makes the root reduplicate (see zlau).
chunk 78: lectures